Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Andy Cowley's avatar

Excellent article, Chris, thank you for the work you put into these.

I think the main thing I take away from this is how terrible using combustion fuel as a propellant for space travel is. However, I am not aware of an alternative. The EM Drive didn't seem to come to anything; the nuclear-controlled explosion option that was proposed back in the Orion project during the 60s seems suicidal (unless some advances in nukes are currently secretly available). Freeman Dyson walked away because of his casualty estimates.

Two other options come to mind: Vacuum Space, large body lifters and the old Beanstalk. Modern metamaterials are such that both of these could be achieved.

Then you have the reactionless drives that are typical in UAP and Science fiction, the antigravity, inertia-cancelling systems, wonderful to imagine, but is there any reality to the science of these?

Interested to hear thoughts on these?

Best Regards

Andy

Expand full comment
2 more comments...

No posts